BRM notes part 2of5
Unit – II: Selection and Formulation of Business Research Problems
Business Research Problems:
Business research problems are specific issues or challenges that researchers aim to address through their research. These problems can vary widely and often stem from the need to make informed decisions, improve operations, or explore opportunities in the business context. Examples of business research problems could include understanding customer preferences, optimizing supply chain operations, or evaluating the effectiveness of a marketing campaign.
Definitions:
Donald R. Cooper and Pamela S. Schindler, in their book "Business Research Methods," define a research problem as "the initial step in a research process, and it centers on the unambiguous articulation of the problem statement that sets the scope, direction, and coverage of the research."
William G. Zikmund, in "Business Research Methods," defines a research problem as "a statement that specifies what information is needed to solve a particular problem."
Criteria for Business Research Problems:
The criteria for defining a good research problem include:
Relevance: The problem should be relevant to the business or industry in question, addressing a real concern or opportunity.
Clarity: It should be clearly and precisely articulated, avoiding ambiguity or vagueness.
Feasibility: The problem should be researchable within available resources, including time, budget, and data.
Novelty: A good research problem often contributes to existing knowledge or addresses a gap in the literature.
Importance: The problem should have practical implications or significance for decision-making.
Sources of Literature for Business Research:
Sources of literature for business research include:
Academic Journals: Scholarly journals like the Harvard Business Review, Journal of Marketing, and Journal of Management provide research articles, case studies, and theoretical frameworks.
Books: Textbooks, reference books, and monographs written by experts in the field provide in-depth knowledge on various aspects of business.
Government Reports: Reports from government agencies and institutions may contain valuable data and statistics relevant to business research.
Market Research Reports: Reports from market research firms, such as Nielsen, Gartner, and Forrester, offer insights into market trends and consumer behavior.
Databases: Online databases like ProQuest, JSTOR, and EBSCOhost provide access to a vast collection of research papers, articles, and reports.
Websites and Online Publications: Reputable business websites, industry blogs, and online magazines can be sources of up-to-date information and business news.
Trade Associations: Industry-specific trade associations often publish research findings, reports, and industry benchmarks.
News Media: Newspapers, magazines, and news websites can provide current events and trends in the business world.
Conference Proceedings: Academic and industry conferences often publish proceedings that include research papers and presentations.
Research Statement:
A research statement is a brief but comprehensive overview of the research project. It typically appears at the beginning of a research proposal, thesis, or dissertation, and it serves to introduce the research to the reader. The research statement should provide a clear understanding of what the research is about, its significance, and the context in which it will be conducted.
Elements of research statement:
Research Topic: A concise and descriptive title or topic that captures the essence of the research.
Research Problem or Question: A statement or a set of questions that define the specific issue or problem the research aims to address. This should clearly articulate the gap or challenge the research seeks to explore.
Rationale and Significance: An explanation of why the research is important and how it contributes to existing knowledge or addresses real-world issues.
Scope and Boundaries: An indication of the limits of the research, including what will be included and what will be excluded.
Methodological Approach: A brief description of the research methods and strategies that will be employed to investigate the problem.
Expected Outcomes: A preview of the anticipated results and the potential impact or implications of the research.
Research Hypothesis (if applicable): A concise statement of the hypothesis or hypotheses that will be tested in the research.
Objectives of the Study:
The objectives of the study are specific, measurable, and achievable goals or outcomes that the research project aims to accomplish. These objectives are derived from the research statement and provide a more detailed breakdown of what the research will focus on and what it seeks to achieve. The objectives help guide the research process and serve as benchmarks for evaluating the research's success. They typically include:
Main Objective: The primary goal or purpose of the research, often related to addressing the research problem or question stated in the research statement.
Specific Objectives: Detailed, actionable steps or sub-goals that outline how the main objective will be achieved. Specific objectives may include activities such as data collection, analysis, or the development of recommendations.
Measurable Outcomes: Objectives should be framed in a way that allows for measurement or assessment of their achievement. This ensures that progress can be tracked and evaluated.
Timeframe: A rough timeline or schedule for accomplishing each objective, including estimated start and end dates.
Relevance: Each objective should directly contribute to the research's overall purpose and address the research problem.
Clarity: Objectives should be written in a clear, concise, and unambiguous manner to avoid confusion.
Feasibility: Objectives should be realistic and achievable within the constraints of the research project, such as available resources and time.
Review of Literature:
A review of literature is a critical step in business research, where existing literature on the research topic is examined to identify gaps, trends, and areas of interest. The review of literature involves the following steps:
Identification: Find and access relevant literature sources, such as academic papers, books, reports, and articles.
Categorization: Categorize the literature based on themes, theories, or research methodologies.
Analysis: Critically evaluate the literature, looking for commonalities, differences, and trends.
Synthesis: Synthesize the findings from the literature to create a comprehensive overview of the research area.
Identification of Gaps: Identify gaps or areas where further research is needed based on the limitations or unexplored aspects of the existing literature.
Identification of Research Gap:
Identifying a research gap is a crucial step in business research. It involves pinpointing areas where current knowledge is insufficient or where there is a need for additional investigation. The process includes:
Reviewing Existing Literature: Carefully analyzing the existing literature to understand what has been studied and what remains unexplored.
Examining Current Business Context: Consider how changes in the business environment may have created new challenges or opportunities that require research.
Consulting Experts: Seeking insights from experts, colleagues, or industry professionals to identify areas of uncertainty or emerging issues.
Conducting Pilot Studies: Preliminary research or pilot studies can reveal areas where more in-depth investigation is required.
Research Objectives:
Research objectives are specific, clear, and concise statements that describe what a research study intends to achieve. They serve as a guide for the research process and provide a clear direction for the study. Research objectives are essential components of any research project, whether it's in the fields of science, social sciences, business, or any other discipline. They help researchers focus on what they want to accomplish and ensure that the research is purposeful and meaningful.
How to Frame Research Objectives:
Framing research objectives requires a systematic approach to ensure that they are well-defined and achievable. Here are the steps to frame research objectives:
Identify the Research Problem: Start by clearly understanding the research problem or question you want to address. What is the key issue or concern that your research aims to explore or resolve?
Review Existing Literature: Conduct a thorough literature review to understand what has already been researched in your area of interest. This will help you identify gaps in the existing knowledge.
Determine the Scope: Define the boundaries and scope of your research. What aspects or dimensions of the research problem will your study cover? Be specific about what you will and will not address.
Consider Your Research Type: Depending on the nature of your research (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, or hypothesis-testing), your objectives may differ. For example, in exploratory research, the objective might be to gain insights and generate hypotheses, while in explanatory research, the objective could involve testing causal relationships.
Use the SMART Criteria: SMART is an acronym that stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Your research objectives should meet these criteria:
- Specific: Clearly state what you intend to achieve. Avoid vague language.
- Measurable: Include a way to measure or assess the outcomes. How will you know if you've achieved the objective?
- Achievable: Ensure that the objective is feasible within the constraints of your research project (time, budget, resources).
- Relevant: The objective should be directly related to the research problem and contribute to addressing it.
- Time-bound: Set a timeframe for when you aim to achieve the objective. This adds a sense of urgency and accountability.
Use Action Words: Write the objectives using action verbs, such as "to analyze," "to evaluate," "to compare," or "to determine." This makes the objectives action-oriented and explicit.
Prioritize Objectives: If you have multiple objectives, prioritize them in terms of their importance and relevance to the research problem.
Why Research Objectives Are Important:
Research objectives are crucial for several reasons:
Direction and Focus: They provide a clear direction and focus for the research study. Researchers and team members can align their efforts and resources toward achieving these objectives.
Measurement and Evaluation: Research objectives make it possible to measure and evaluate the success of the research. They help determine whether the research has fulfilled its intended purpose.
Scope Control: Objectives help define the boundaries of the research. By specifying what will and will not be covered, they prevent the study from becoming too broad or unfocused.
Alignment with Problem: Objectives ensure that the research is directly aligned with the research problem or question. This prevents the study from veering off into unrelated areas.
Accountability: SMART objectives with specific timeframes hold researchers accountable for meeting deadlines and achieving the desired outcomes.
Communication: Clear and well-defined objectives make it easier to communicate the research's purpose and goals to stakeholders, collaborators, and funders.
Framing of Objectives:
Research objectives are specific statements that define what the research aims to achieve. They provide a clear roadmap for the study. Framing research objectives involves:
Being Specific: Objectives should be clear, precise, and well-defined, leaving no room for ambiguity.
Being Measurable: Objectives should be quantifiable or observable, allowing for the assessment of achievement.
Being Achievable: Objectives should be realistic and attainable within the scope of the research.
Being Time-Bound: Objectives should have a specific timeframe or deadline for completion.
Being Aligned with Research Problem: Objectives should directly address the research problem and contribute to its resolution.
Formulation of Hypothesis:
Hypotheses are statements that propose a relationship or association between variables and are essential in quantitative research. The process of formulating hypotheses includes:
Identifying Variables: Determine the variables under investigation, including independent and dependent variables.
Stating Null and Alternative Hypotheses: The null hypothesis (H0) suggests no relationship, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) posits a specific relationship between variables.
Determining the Direction: If applicable, state whether the hypothesis predicts a positive or negative relationship.
Considering Testable Statements: Hypotheses should be framed in a way that allows for empirical testing.
Testing of Hypothesis:
Testing of hypothesis is a fundamental step in the research process, particularly in the field of statistics and scientific inquiry. It involves evaluating the validity of a null hypothesis (H0) by comparing it with an alternative hypothesis (Ha or H1). The goal of hypothesis testing is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence in the sample data to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This process helps in making informed decisions and drawing conclusions based on data and evidence.
The steps involved in testing a hypothesis:
Formulate Hypotheses: Start by stating the null hypothesis (H0), which represents the status quo or a default assumption, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha or H1), which represents the researcher's claim or the effect they are trying to prove.
Select a Significance Level (Alpha): The significance level, denoted by α, determines the threshold for statistical significance. Common values for α are 0.05 (5%) or 0.01 (1%), but it can be set according to the research context.
Collect Data: Gather data through observations, experiments, or surveys that are relevant to the hypothesis being tested.
Perform a Statistical Test: Choose an appropriate statistical test (e.g., t-test, chi-squared test, ANOVA, regression analysis) based on the research design and data type. Calculate a test statistic from the sample data.
Determine the P-value: The p-value represents the probability of obtaining results as extreme as those observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
Compare P-value to Alpha: If the p-value is less than or equal to the chosen significance level (α), you reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than α, you fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Draw a Conclusion: Based on the comparison between the p-value and α, you make a decision. If you reject the null hypothesis, you may conclude that there is evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If you fail to reject the null hypothesis, you do not have enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Type 1 Error (False Positive):
Type 1 error, often denoted as α (alpha), occurs when you incorrectly reject a null hypothesis that is, in fact, true. In other words, it's a false positive error. It means you have found an effect or relationship in your data when, in reality, there is no effect. The probability of making a Type 1 error is equal to the chosen significance level (α). For example, if you set α at 0.05, you accept a 5% risk of making a Type 1 error.
Type 2 Error (False Negative):
Type 2 error, often denoted as β (beta), occurs when you incorrectly fail to reject a null hypothesis that is false. In other words, it's a false negative error. It means you have failed to detect an effect or relationship in your data when, in reality, there is an effect. The probability of making a Type 2 error is related to the power of the test, which is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis. Power (1 - β) depends on factors like the sample size, effect size, and significance level.
Content Author
I'm Raja Kumar R, writer and explorer. I explore the world through writing.
